[单选] 根据以下材料回答{TSE}题: Benefited or HurtFor the most part, it seems, workers in r

  [复制链接]
查看: 308|回复: 6

4万

主题

4万

帖子

13万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
137733
发表于 2022-3-22 21:03:47 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

[单选] 根据以下材料回答题:
        Benefited or Hurt

For the most part, it seems, workers in  rich countries have little to fear from globalization, and a lot to gain. But  is the same thing true for workers in poor countries? The answer is that they  are even more likely than their rich country counterparts to benefit, because  they have less to lose and more to gain. Orthodox economics takes an optimistic  line on integration and the developing countries. Openness to foreign trade and  investment should encourage capital to flow to poor economies. In the  developing world, capital is scarce, so the returns on investment there should  be higher than in the industrialized countries, where the best opportunities to  make money by adding capital to labor have already been used up. If pool  countries lower their barriers to trade and investment, the theory goes: rich  foreigners wilt want to send over some of their capital.
If  this inflow of resources arrives in the form of loans or portfolio investment,  it will supplement domestic savings and loosen the financial constraint on  additional investment by local companies. If it arrives in the form of new  foreign controlled operations, FDI, so much the better: this kind of capital  brings technology and skills from abroad packaged along with it, with less  financial risk as well. In either case, the addition to investment
ought to push incomes up, partly by raising  the demand for labor and partly by making labor more productive. This why  workers in FDI receiving countries should be in an even better position to  profit from integration than workers in FDI sending countries. Also, with or  without inflows of foreign capital, the same static and dynamic gains from  trade should apply in developing countries as in rich ones. This gain from  trade logic often arouses suspicion, because the benefits seem to come from  nowhere. Surely one side or the other must lose. Not so. The benefits that a  rich country gets though trade do not come at the expense of its poor country  trading partners, or vice versa. Recall that according to the theory, trade is  a positive sum game. In all these transactions, sides exporters and importers,  borrowers and lenders, shareholders and workers can gain.

According to the passage, who may be reasonably afraid of the globalization?

A . Workers in rich countries
B . Workers in poor countries
C . Both of them
D . None of them

参考答案
****此区域为收费内容****    需支付 1 知识币后可查看,1币=0.01元查看答案


参考解析:
【解析】文章第一段中说明,“workers in rich countries have little to fear from globalization”和“they are ever more likely than their rich country counter parts to benefit”,可知穷国和富国的工人都会在全球化中得到很大的好处,因此都不必害怕全球化,D为正确选项。

回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

3463

帖子

5194

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
5194
发表于 2022-3-22 21:34:04 | 显示全部楼层
甘肃电大形考作业有答案吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

3万

帖子

4万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
46312
发表于 2022-3-22 21:34:06 | 显示全部楼层
浙江电大形考作业有答案吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

3485

帖子

5227

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
5227
发表于 2022-3-22 21:34:09 | 显示全部楼层
奥鹏南开大学作业可以做吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

3520

帖子

5280

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
5280
发表于 2022-3-22 21:34:11 | 显示全部楼层
666666
回复

使用道具 举报

5万

主题

8万

帖子

18万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
189561
发表于 2022-3-22 21:34:15 | 显示全部楼层
雅宝题库就是不错!
回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

3479

帖子

5219

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
5219
发表于 2022-3-22 21:34:15 | 显示全部楼层
电大形考作业答案有吗?
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

精彩课程推荐
|网站地图|网站地图